ACCREDITATION

Introduction

Accreditation is a recognition status granted for a stipulated period to the learning programmes after a QAC evaluation indicates that it meets or exceeds minimum thresholds of educational quality.

Accreditation is both a status and a process. It should provide a public certification of acceptable quality as well as the opportunity and incentive for self-improvement in the learning programmes accredited.

The process of accreditation should provide education institutions with an opportunity for critical self-analysis leading to improvement of quality; for consultation and advice from persons coming from other institutions. This is not only to meet certain standards but also to continuously seek ways in which to enhance the quality of education. Therefore accreditation must be a process in different steps: the nine stepping-stones of accreditation are:

  1. Development of an Application
  2. Submission of Initial Documentation
  3. Preliminary Review of Initial Documentation
  4. Formative evaluation
  5. Evaluation process
  6. Site Visit
  7. Report Preparation
  8. Accreditation Decisions
  9. Dissemination
    The result of the whole accreditation process is an accreditation report accessible by all stakeholders. If accreditation is to be accepted by all parties concerned the process must be completely transparent. The accreditation process is based on the assessment of the program by subject and field specialists based on agreed upon criteria. The application form that is structured in two sections.
    •  Section A is focused on institutional information.
    •  Section B is focused on the learning programmes.

Procedure For Evaluation Request

Procedure for Evaluation of Requests for
Accreditation of Learning Programmes at Education & Training Providers
(Revised 26 March 20011)

The following 7-step procedure is applicable to all requests seeking accreditation for new programmes at education institutions.

Steps Documentary Evidence & Clarifications
1- Receiving the Request
1.1 To be received at QAC prior to the next commencement, for which it is proposed to start. Request is recorded in the database of the new requests.
2- Request complete administratively
2.1 Submitted on “Form QAC”, for learning programs, signed and dated.
2.2 Submitted on “Form QAC”, for institutions, signed and dated.
2.3 All listed documents in the Forms attached.
2.4 Two copies—hard and electronic—of the request are submitted.
2.5 Relevant licensing and accreditation fees are transferred to QAC’s bank account.
2.6 Requests submitted by stipulated date and not completed administratively by date of the following year are dropped from the database, and have to re-apply.
3- Evaluation of Request
3.1 In-house evaluation by the relevant “Specialization Coordinator”.
3.2 Send request to an internal (within Malaysia) evaluator.
3.3 Send request to an external (within UK) evaluator.
3.4 Specify 3 weeks for the submission of evaluations.
3.5 Requests are sent under the cover of a Standard Letter.
4- Follow-up of
Recommendations
4.1 Send evaluations (blind) to the initiator (s) of the request, for follow-up and revisions.
4.2 Grant a period 3-4 weeks to submit required revisions.
4.3 Review evaluations by the relevant “Specialization Coordinator” at QAC.
4.4 If recommendations are contradictory, send the entire file to the QAC Council member who specializes in the same field, for opinion.
5- Site Visit
5.1 Not required for every request. If the information submitted not clear, or accurate, or persuasive, etc., the Chief Executive arranges for a Site Visit.
5.2 A Site Visit Team of 2-3 is composed, generally, of the Chief Executive, the “Chief Assessor” and an external specialist in the field.
5.3 The time for the Site Visit is arranged with the relevant institution.
5.4 The purpose of the Site Visit is communicated in writing to the relevant institution.
5.5 The “Section Head” prepares a Site Visit Report, which becomes an integral part of the evaluations.
6- Decision
6.1 Send all evaluations to QAC Board, accompanied with a summary of main conclusions, using the “Decision-Taking Form”.
6.2 Place a copy of all requests under discussion on QAC website, with restricted access to Board members, for ease of reference.
6.3 QAC Board discusses all requests ready for decision, in one or more special Council sessions for this purpose. The decisions and conditionalities are recorded on the “Decision-Taking Form”, which gets signed by the Chief Executive of QAC.
6.4 The Chief Executive arranges for a special session with the Commissioner General, to review the decisions and issue the appropriate letters, signed by the Commissioner General.
7- Dissemination
7.1 QAC updates the “Audit Report”, including the new decisions.

Reference Documents

QUALITY ASSURANCE COMMISSION
GENERAL POLICY REGARDING LEARNING PROGRAMMES IN
EDUCATION & TRAINING AT INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

This General Policy is comprised of the following nine Guiding Principles:

  1. Postgraduate level learning programmes are to be accredited in any specialisation.
  2. Learning programmes at the professional level are to be encouraged only if their viability is verified and confirmed according to the explicit accreditation criteria adopted by the Accreditation and Quality Assurance Commission. On the other hand, proposed programmes at the postgraduate level whose objective is to develop existing programmes at the graduate level may be considered only after submitting an evaluation of the existing graduate level programme, which should have graduated at least one class.
  3. Encourage programmes that depend on successful and proven experiences at the institution in which they are proposed.
  4. Encourage programmes that result in interaction and cooperation with international programmes of excellence through the exchange of knowledge, faculty members, etc.
  5. Encourage programmes in modern fields of knowledge, such as information technology, technological sciences, etc., which emphasize the interdisciplinary nature, and which may impact directly the development of the International society, the development of scientific research, the production of knowledge, and the supply of high caliber of trained human resources to the private and public sectors.
  6. Give priority to new programmes that reinforce the principle of specialization and complementarities among the programmes offered at the institutions.
  7. Priority is given to programs that reinforce the principle of complementarily among private institutions, whereby institutions apply theories on the ground, and focus on technical and vocational programmes and technological applications, aimed at enhancing the employment potential in the economy.
  8. Build on, benefit from, and develop the programmes that manifest excellence in professional and vocational institutions.

Accreditation Form

 
 
Copyright © 2011 Quality Assurance Commission
All Rights Reserved.